Files
ClaudeDo/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-19-feature-unification-design.md
Mika Kuns 0993eb0e75 docs(unification): spec + phased plan for one-component-per-feature
Maps duplication into three buckets (parallel impls, entry-point sprawl, dead/leftover) and defines six phased unification slices: groundwork, DialogService, MergeCoordinator, WorktreeActions, AgentConfigeditor, unified DiffViewer.
2026-06-26 16:11:47 +02:00

92 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Feature unification — one component per feature
Date: 2026-06-19
## Goal
ClaudeDo grew organically; several features now exist as parallel implementations
or are reachable through many hand-wired entry points. This design maps the
duplication and defines a target where **each feature is one component**, reached
through one path, with dead code removed.
## Method
Mapped via five parallel exploration agents (merge/conflict, review→merge,
diff+worktree, task create/edit, UI entry-point inventory), then verified the
load-bearing claims by grep/read before writing this. Every file:line below was
confirmed against the working tree on 2026-06-19.
## Key finding: it is NOT three merge engines
There is **one** merge engine (`TaskMergeService`), wrapped **once** for multi-child
units (`PlanningMergeOrchestrator`), with **one** conflict resolver (the Rider
3-pane). `Worker/CLAUDE.md` already records "there is no separate 'Merge all' entry —
approve is the single review+merge action." What *looks* like 23 merge features is
**entry-point sprawl** in the UI plus **one dead hunks-API** left over from the
Layer-C rework. So unification is mostly UI plumbing + deletion, not re-architecting
the engine.
## Findings — three buckets
### Bucket A — genuine duplication (parallel implementations of one job)
| # | Feature | Duplicated components | Shared already |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Diff viewing | `DiffModalViewModel` (worktree + commit-range), `WorktreeModalViewModel` (file-tree + per-file), `PlanningDiffViewModel` (per-subtask + integration) | `UnifiedDiffParser`, `DiffLinesView` (good) |
| A2 | Agent-config editing | `ListSettingsModalViewModel` (list scope), `AgentSettingsSectionViewModel` (task scope); global lives in `SettingsModalViewModel` | `InheritanceResolver`, `InheritedBadge` (good) |
| A3 | Worktree actions | `WorktreesOverviewModalViewModel` per-row cmds (Merge/Discard/Keep/ForceRemove/ShowDiff/Jump) vs `MergeSectionViewModel` (Merge/OpenDiff) | same `IWorkerClient` calls |
| A4 | Merge display | `AgentStripView` re-displays `MergeSectionViewModel` state | — |
### Bucket B — entry-point sprawl (one backend, many hand-wired doors)
| # | Feature | Doors | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Conflict-resolution seam | 5 copies of `Func<string,string,Task>? RequestConflictResolution` | `WorktreesOverviewModalViewModel.cs:83`, `DiffModalViewModel.cs:75`, `MergeModalViewModel.cs:33`, `MergeSectionViewModel.cs:51`, `DetailsIslandViewModel.cs:347` (delegates). Threaded through `MainWindow.axaml.cs:81`, `IslandsShellViewModel.cs:49/202`, `DiffModalViewModel.cs:103`, `MergeSectionViewModel.cs:159` |
| B2 | Diff (open) | 34 | MergeSection "Open Diff", TaskHeaderBar "Review Merged Diff", WorktreesOverview "Show Diff", Planning "Review Combined" |
| B3 | List Settings dialog | 3 | Lists context menu, Tasks header button, shell bridge `IslandsShellViewModel.cs:190-194` |
| B4 | Worktrees Overview | 23 | Repos menu (global), Lists context menu (per-list) |
| B5 | Repo Import | 2 | Repos menu, Lists footer button |
The conflict-resolution *target* is already single-point (`IslandsShellViewModel.RequestConflictResolutionAsync`, line 49). What is duplicated is the **seam plumbing**: five VMs each own the Func and it is threaded by hand.
### Bucket C — dead / leftover
| # | Item | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | Dead hunks conflict API | `TaskMergeService.GetConflictsAsync` (`Lifecycle/TaskMergeService.cs:250`) ← `WorkerHub.GetMergeConflicts` (`Hub/WorkerHub.cs:378`) ← `WorkerClient` `"GetMergeConflicts"` (`Services/WorkerClient.cs:276`) ← `IWorkerClient`. Live resolver uses `GetMergeConflictDocuments` (`WorkerHub.cs:389`). Only `TaskMergeServiceTests.cs:672` still references the old one. |
| C2 | Two task-creation paths | UI quick-add `TasksIslandViewModel.AddAsync` writes EF directly (`db.Tasks.Add`); MCP `ExternalMcpService.AddTask` is the service path. They can drift. |
| C3 | Stale worktrees | `.claude/worktrees/feat+planning-sessions-ui/…` carries old copies of `DiffModalViewModel`/`ListSettingsModalViewModel`/`WorktreeModalViewModel`; layer-c resolver leftovers. Worktree hygiene, not main code. |
| C4 | Naming drift (deferred) | Hub `StartConflictMerge`/`ContinueConflictMerge`/`AbortConflictMerge` (`WorkerHub.cs:367/405/414`) vs service `MergeAsync`/`ContinueMergeAsync`/`AbortMergeAsync`. **Documented as intentional** at `Worker/CLAUDE.md:153`. |
## Targets — one component per feature
1. **MergeCoordinator (B1).** Replace the five `RequestConflictResolution` Func seams with one injected coordinator exposing `MergeAsync(taskId, targetBranch)` that owns the "merge → on-conflict open resolver" sequence. Every door (review Approve, Diff Merge button, WorktreesOverview single + batch, Details merge section) calls it. The single resolution point (`IslandsShellViewModel.RequestConflictResolutionAsync`) becomes the coordinator's body.
2. **DiffViewer (A1 + B2).** One `DiffViewerViewModel` + view with a `DiffSource` abstraction (`DirtyWorktree | BranchVsBase | CommitRange | PlanningAggregate | IntegrationBranch`) and an optional file-tree pane. Replaces `DiffModal` + `WorktreeModal` + `PlanningDiff` shells; keeps `UnifiedDiffParser`/`DiffLinesView`. All B2 doors open it with a different source.
3. **WorktreeActions (A3).** One `WorktreeActionsViewModel` for a single task's worktree (merge/diff/discard/keep/force-remove), reused by both the overview rows and the Details merge section instead of each owning copies.
4. **AgentConfigEditor (A2).** One editor component parameterized by scope (`Global | List | Task`) over `InheritanceResolver`, embedded in Settings, List Settings, and the Details panel. Collapses the duplicated property set + reset commands + badges.
5. **DialogService (B3B5).** Consolidate the per-modal `Show*` Func seams (`IslandsShellViewModel.cs:59-71`) into one `IDialogService` with typed open methods (`OpenListSettings(list)`, `OpenRepoImport()`, `OpenWorktreesOverview(listId?)`…). Menu, context menu, and footer all call the same method; duplicate command definitions across `ListsIsland`/shell collapse to one.
6. **Single task-creation path (C2).** Route UI quick-add through the same creation path MCP `AddTask` uses (repository/service), so both honor the same invariants.
Plus **C1** (delete dead hunks API + its test) and **C3** (prune stale worktrees) as groundwork. **C4** naming alignment is **deferred** — it is documented-intentional and would churn the hub + `WorkerClient` + every `IWorkerClient` fake (see the "fakes to sync" hazard) for cosmetic gain.
## Decisions
- **Phased, each phase ships green.** Six independently buildable/committable slices; cheapest and lowest-risk first (see the plan). No big-bang.
- **One plan file per slice.** Matching the 2026-06-05 layer-A/B/C convention, each slice gets its own `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-19-unify-<slice>.md` authored when it is picked up. This umbrella plan sequences them and details Phase 01.
- **DiffViewer (A1) is last.** Highest effort and most UX-sensitive (file-tree vs whole-unified are different layouts); deferring it lets the cheaper wins land first and de-risks the big one.
- **Keep the merge engine and the resolver seam contract.** `TaskMergeService`, `PlanningMergeOrchestrator`, `ConflictResolverViewModel` ctor/`OpenAsync`/`OpenForPlanningAsync`/`CloseRequested` are unchanged — unification is above them.
- **Naming alignment deferred, not done** (rationale above).
## Out of scope / deferred
- Hub/service merge-method renaming (C4).
- Subtask deletion in the UI (a missing feature surfaced during mapping, not a duplicate).
- Any DB migration, worker engine change, or push.
## Acceptance (per phase)
Each phase: `dotnet build -c Release` clean for touched projects; the relevant test
project green; locales in parity (Localization.Tests) where keys change; the feature
reachable through its single new path with the old doors removed or delegating. UI
phases (25) flag a visual-verification gap for Mika to confirm in the running app.