Files
ClaudeDo/docs/explore-notes/README.md
T

2.5 KiB

Explore-notes

Distilled, reusable maps of complex subsystems, produced by deep code exploration. The goal: stop re-exploring the same subsystem from scratch in every new session.

These sit between the CLAUDE.md files and the code:

  • CLAUDE.md — high-level orientation, hand-maintained, always-loaded.
  • explore-notes — deeper subsystem detail (flows, who-calls-whom, invariants) that is too fine-grained for a CLAUDE.md but stable enough to be worth caching. Read on demand.
  • code — the only source of truth.

Index

Note Covers
worker-task-pipeline TaskRunner end-to-end: config resolution, worktree, CLI invocation, streaming, commit
usage-monitoring OAuth usage endpoint, gate, throttle, per-run token accounting, usage pill/modal
external-mcp The claudedo MCP tool surface + its two test-enforced conventions
review-merge Approve=merge-unit, verify gate, MergeCommit/revert, diff stack, conflict resolver
conpty-sessions Interactive/planning/list-handler launch specs + the arg-flattening gotcha
installer-preflight --permission-mode auto eligibility, CLI version floor, login check, .NET runtime requirements

Rules

  • Only stable structure. Flows, responsibilities, entry points, invariants, relative file paths. No line numbers, no exhaustive symbol dumps — those rot fastest.
  • Verify before trusting. A note is a starting map, not authority. Always confirm against current code before acting on it. Each note records the commit it was verified against so you can diff for drift.
  • Not a substitute for CLAUDE.md. If a fact belongs in orientation, put it there.

Header every note must carry

> **Explore-note — verify before trusting.** Distilled map of a subsystem, not authoritative.
> Last verified against commit `<short-hash>` (<date>).
> Drift check: `git log --oneline <short-hash>..HEAD -- <paths this note covers>`
> Stable structure only (no line numbers). See docs/explore-notes/README.md.

Workflow

  1. Before deep-exploring a subsystem, check for a matching note here and read it first; explore only to fill gaps or confirm.
  2. After a deep explore, distill the durable findings into a new/updated note and bump its "verified against" commit line.
  3. If the drift check shows the covered paths changed a lot since the verified commit, treat the note as suspect and re-verify the parts you rely on.